My manuscript submitted to Nat. Geometric Distribution Expected Value Proof, The life of a professional scientific journal editor is exciting, challenging, and intellectually stimulating, but it requires a thick skin. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. I think it is important for the reader to know where the project is at the moment- is still being implemented and prospect of sustainability given that its one of the objective of involving stakeholders. Many submissions are declined without being sent for review. Answer: Such quick changes may mean a glitch, but given that it's a Nature journal, that's unlikely. Unfortunately, the majority of manuscripts received by publishing houses are immediately rejected. Accessibility Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. Or it just means that an editor is evaluating it? Time to First Decision: From submission to first decision, the journal aims to provide authors with a quick decision. and our Institutions who are the most active at promoting their training, see the best engagement rates from their researchers. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. gebirgsziege on Wed Jun 27 07:39:58 2012 said: 1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved. Editor did not intervene. A manuscript under editorial consideration indicates that the work has not been rejected out of hand, but is being given a second look. However, we send only about 12% of submitted papers out for peer review. The dataset is uploaded is OSF. The Journals and Editorial press office distributes embargoed mailings highlighting upcoming content to registered journalists six days in advance of publication. the review process improved the manuscript significantly and was very straightforward. this is editorial consideration. Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. 2002 We evaluate which concerns are crucial to address and which are not, and communicate this to the authors. Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts. The journal has confirmed that you've uploaded and submitted the correct documents and that the content of your paper is relevant . Hence, Nature prefers to stick with the original referees of a particular paper rather than to call in new referees to arbitrate, unless there is some specific way in which the referee can be shown to be technically lacking or biased in judgement. All authors of the manuscript have read and agreed to its content and are accountable for all aspects of the accuracy and integrity of the manuscript in accordance with ICMJE criteria That the article is original, has not already been published in a journal, and is not currently under consideration by another journal. At the same time, do write a polite follow-up email to the journal requesting the current status of the manuscript. A manuscript under editorial consideration indicates that the work has not been rejected out of hand, but is being given a second look. A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. RSI welcomes the submission of original manuscripts on novel scientific instruments and techniques of experimental measurement and data analysis methods. After each interview, we discussed each interview and identified the topics to be deeply explored into themes emerging in earlier interviews. before being sent to te reviewers an editor usually has a quick look at your paper - to see if you meet all the criteria of the journal (e.g. The committee developed a monitoring sheet that the nutritionist and a research team member filled every week to measure the adherence to the defined intervention in all four cafeterias. Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. Decision pending means that the decision is pending. Please do not hesitate to contact us to learn more about our writing services. . ISSN 1548-7091 (print), Open Researcher and Contributor Identifier (ORCID). All manuscripts are handled electronically throughout the consideration process. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________, This ensures compliance with our editorial policies related to research ethics and reproducibility, as well as competing interests, authorship, data and code availability. [CDATA[> The life of a professional scientific journal editor is exciting, challenging, and . . Any chance these are used in a bad or good way when describing a papers journey to being published? ______________________________________________________________________________________________________, For manuscripts in the life sciences, clinical sciences, behavioural & social sciences and ecology, evolution & environmental sciences, This structured form provides a consistent template intended to support our policies on transparent reporting. On the Encyclopedia platform, the entry type "Topic Review " has a Definition part that usually starts with "Title is". When your manuscript is accepted for publication, the corresponding author receives the proofs of your manuscript. Answer: Status descriptions vary across journals. If a paper is lacking in one of these areas, this does not necessarily spell its end; we may review a promising paper that needs more work, or we might suggest further experiments that could make it a stronger candidate for peer review. The OA option will be offered to the author at the time the manuscript is submitted. I submitted to Nature Neuroscience about 9 days ago and it's been "under consideration" for about a week. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________, Policies specific to Nature Human Behaviour, ______________________________________________________________________________________________________, Nature Methods (Nat Methods) What is the meaning of decision in process status? We look forward to your comments and remain with best regards; Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx, PONE-D-21-05456R1Stakeholder engagement in a hypertension and diabetes prevention research program Description and Lessons learnedPLOS ONE. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. We closely follow community cultures in enforcing standards for reporting and data deposition. To help recognize the dedication that the team puts into editing each paper, and to promote further transparency in our editorial processes, we will soon begin adding the editors names to papers that we publish in Nature Methods. n/a: n/a: 8.0 days: n/a: n/a: n/a: Rejected (im.) Cite 1 Recommendation Deleted profile Usually it means "with editor". An important topic that will contribute to stakeholder engagement in interventions knowledge base. To obtain You can also try manuscript writing assistance. Authors subsequently receive an e-proof, including the figures, and can also download a PDF proof of the layout. [CDATA[// >. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter what matters in science, free to your inbox daily. Internet Explorer). Most papers are sent to two or three referees, but some are sent to more or, occasionally, just to one. All Articles published in Nature go through at least one round of review, usually two or three, sometimes more. In each session, a brief introduction of the study and ethical considerations about maintaining confidentiality of the participants, were explained. For 21 days the manuscript status was "under consideration" Manuscript Under Editorial Consideration Nature Mason Jar Luminaries Tissue Paper Manuscript Under Editorial Consideration Nature. Hopefully, the exact situation will become clear with the next status update. The paper is rejected because the referees have raised considerable technical objections and/or the authors claim has not been adequately established. So, the present status may mean that the EiC now needs to make a decision based on the peer review comments or on the revised manuscript. The manuscript was published somewhere else with a higher . Manuscripts should be submitted through our online submission system. [CDATA[// >